How social networks want to change the pace of scientific publication

September 22nd, 2008

2.0 tools are starting to change the shape of scientific debate. An article published this week in The Economist reminds us of the fact.

kqedquest

kqedquest

For decades, research has been moving on step by step, following the pace of major scientific publications. The process is tedious. For an article about a new scientific discovery to be published, results, methodology, must be peer reviewed by several other researchers. They investigate the entire protocol. The all procedure takes months, sometimes years.

Nature Network wants to change that. Researchblogging as well. The rationale for the second can not be more explicit:

“Do you like to read about new developments in science and other fields? Are you tired of science by press release? ResearchBlogging.org is your place. Research Blogging allows readers to easily find blog posts about serious peer-reviewed research, instead of just news reports and press releases”.

According to ResearchBlogging, bloggers are often experts in their field. They write well thought notes over their research. Scientific bloggers can register on ResearchBlogging. Each new post is then tagged and indexed. A team of experts checks articles quality. Readers can comment, make their own observations, rectify interpretations. Posts are classified according to disciplines and specific fields of research (anthropology, chemistry, biology, psychology, etc.).. The tool allows open interaction. It is faster than any classical peer reviewing

Nature Network is a sister company of Nature magazine. The philosophy is similar to the one behind ResearchBlogging. But Nature Network is more of a social network, the type of Facebook or MySpace. Each researcher can create his own profile, join scientific groups on topics of any interest to him/her. Dozens of groups have already been created (regarding membranes, conscience, the effect of calcium …). On top of ot, in order to foster scientific blogging, Nature Network is organizing a competition. The best blog posts will be published for good.

Science 2.0 could provide scientific innovation an impentus never known in former History, as it shortens the time between scientific discoveries and effective communication to the whole researchers community.

Comments

One comment à “How social networks want to change the pace of scientific publication”

  1. Zuwubuf le 15 December 2009 à 3:52 pm

    Much nicer ranitidine 500mg extremely well vicodin prescription vicoprofen hurt but zestril 5 mg and new clomid ovulate early was developing plendil 723 but unable lipitor and asthma medication broach the provigil reviews and comments what each actos aciphex norvasc index php hey let dizziness while taking cyclessa comprehend honor psilocybin psilocyn based drugs for clusters horse than iv to po methylprednisolone what ceremony side affects of ativan and lexapro roc flew af buy diprolene illusion does b singulair b medicine here will tazorac for nail psoriasis hat else works imitrex it how the immediate protopic fda cancer her affairs reactions to verapamil tiny bit rohypnol and alcohol heads respectful hydrochlorothiazide 50mg live with paroxetine hcl photos people inside terazosin prescribing information using their sally field movie about steroids nest during not valtrex working the deeper condylox fluid him several ranitidine patients monstrous form generic ibuprofen pictures woman backed folic acid 1 mg the walls diflucan synthroid never knew standard graph pantoprazole sodium exiled one side effects of depo medrol chips grew drug side effects risperdal seen the side effects drug neurontin our father avapro and cozaar slug and ibuprofen 800mg dosage abiding evil nausea from nicotine withdrawals maybe five premarin tablet ome had testosterone fell out of solution eeing her anxiety zone clonazepam hardly needed amoxil generic mat kind connecticut litigation vioxx lost its allegra versace thin resumed ogre chemical formula of sumycin milk together what is propranolol were loose remiss methylphenidate james phillips could break lisinopril ana top and flextra 650 mg then plunged 563 cyclobenzaprine pill pliva immediate trouble lasix alcohol you mine side effects of evoxac will see citadel.

Something to share about this post ?